High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Parents-in-Law in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove murder beyond reasonable doubt in absence of direct evidence and incomplete chain of circumstances....

The appellants, Sitaram Nana Sarvade and Rukmini Sitaram Sarvade, were convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Film Finance Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Established. Court Holds That Arbitration Agreement Existed via IMPPA Rules, Notice Was Properly Served, and Award Did Not Exceed Claim....

The petitioner, Mr. Gaurang Doshi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 10th August, 2008, made by the Sub-Committee of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Steel Coils Supply Dispute — Non-Conforming Goods Justify Rejection and Damages. The court upheld the arbitral award granting damages for breach of contract where goods did not meet specifications under the contract for sale of goods....

The petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 28th May 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from a contract for supply of Prime H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Court Commissioner in Land Dispute Without Issues Being Framed. Appointment of Commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC Held Premature When No Issues Framed and No Evidence Recorded....

The petitioners challenged an interlocutory order dated 26/02/2014 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, J.D., Washi, Dist. Osmanabad, below Exh.18 in RCS No.268/2013. The respondents had filed the suit se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant's Specific Performance Suit for Lack of Readiness and Willingness — Agreement Holder Not Entitled to Equitable Relief. Concurrent findings affirmed that appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963....

The dispute pertains to a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellant, Smt H Lalithamma, claimed that she entered into an agree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant in Urban Land Ceiling Case Due to Delay and Laches and Third-Party Rights. Challenge to declaration of excess land under ULCAR Act fails as possession taken and land allotted to beneficiaries....

The appellant, Vaijayanti W/o Prabhakar Patil, representing the estate of Yeshwant Kittur, filed intra-court appeals against the order of a learned single Judge dismissing her writ petitions (WP Nos.6...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals and Cross Objection in Specific Performance and Possession Dispute Over KHB Allotted House. Agreement Holder Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963....

The case involves a dispute over a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellants, Smt H Lalithamma and Vemareddi, claimed that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Part — Reduces Compensation by Setting Aside Pain and Suffering Award and Lowering Interest Rate. Following Sarla Verma, no compensation for pain and suffering is payable to legal heirs in fatal accident cases under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1987....

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against the judgment and order dated 31st January 2012 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, which partly allowed the claim petition filed under Sect...