High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Proper Evidence. Failure to Examine Panch Witness and Prove Licence Requirement Leads to Acquittal Under Section 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954....

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Jayram Atmaram Shadija, proprietor of M/s Durga Laghu Udhyog, for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Appointment of Commissioner in Civil Suit — Appointment Would Amount to Calling Evidence at Instance of Court. The court held that under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a Commissioner cannot be appointed to gather evidence for a party; the parties must prove their own case....

The petitioners challenged an order passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division, Panaji, in Regular Civil Suit No. 11/2007 dated 03.08.2013, whereby an application filed by the respondents for appointme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Grants Leave to Continue Proceedings in Specific Performance Suit. Transfer of Property During Pendency of Lis Pendens Does Not Affect Rights of Parties Under Order 22 Rule 4 and Rule 10 CPC....

The Plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed Suit No. 1166 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement for sale concerning a suit property. The suit was filed on 13 April 2006, and a lis pendens was r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Grants Divorce to Wife on Ground of Cruelty Under Section 32(dd) of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 — Unanimous Delegate Finding of Cruelty Upheld. Wife's Allegations of Mental and Physical Cruelty by Husband Proved, Entitling Her to Divorce and Alimony....

The Plaintiff-wife, Zenobia Ghadially, filed Parsi Suit No. 13 of 2009 in the Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court at Bombay seeking divorce from her husband, Mehrouz Ghadially, on the ground of cruelty unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Appeals Arising from Sessions Case No. 215 of 2006. Appeals Challenge Conviction Under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code....

In the present matter, the appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, along with two other acquitted co-accused, were tried for the murder of six persons at Gavade Vasti, Miraj, on the night of 14/15 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Woman Accused of Murder in Circumstantial Evidence Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Dipee Mahendrasing Dogra, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of one Robin Masih. The prosecution case was that the appellant and the deceased met on a train journey and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose from an MOU dated 3rd March, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleading of Legal Representatives in Suit for Specific Performance. Order Allowing Substitution Under Order 22 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion....

The petitioners, who were not parties to the original suit, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 14.2.2012 passed by the Senior Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution of Permanent Injunction Decree Against Legal Representatives. Decree for Permanent Injunction Binds Legal Representatives of Deceased Judgment-Debtor Under Section 50 CPC and Order 21 Rule 32 CPC....

The petitioners, widow and children of Divira Bolu, challenged the orders passed by the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, in Execution Petition Ex.C.No.25/2013 dated 26.2.2014 and 18.3.20...