High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in First Appeal Arising from Motor Accident Compensation Claim. The Court Examined the Claim for Enhancement of Damages Under Various Heads Including Pain and Suffering, Loss of Amenities, and Future Medical Expenses....

The judgment concerned a First Appeal filed before the Bombay High Court against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Greater Bombay, in Application No. 565 of 1979. The appellant, Rupesh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railways' Petition Challenging Equal Pension to Two Widows. Railway Pension Rules Allow Payment to Multiple Widows in Equal Shares Despite Second Marriage Being Void Under Hindu Marriage Act....

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, and the Divisional Railway Manager, Nagpur, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 28.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation from Rs. 3,36,000 to Rs. 6,21,000. Multiplier of 18 applied for deceased aged 26 years, contributory negligence set aside, and conventional heads enhanced under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 11.10.2011 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati, in Claim Petition No. 221/06. The appellants, being the widow, minor son, and mother of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Depreciation Rate Dispute for Electronic Circuit Board Manufacturer. Assessee manufacturing Electronic Circuit Boards held entitled to 40% depreciation as semi-conductor industry under Income Tax Act, 1961....

The case involves three tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against M/s. Titan Time Products Ltd., concerning the rate of depreciation allowable on plant and machinery used for manufac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for setting wife on fire set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence....

The appellant, Mahadeo Prabhu Loondhe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his wife, Banabai, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced to life imprisonm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Wankhede Stadium to Mumbai Cricket Association. Court holds that lease of public property at nominal rent for promoting sports is not arbitrary and is a valid policy decision....

The petitioners, including Aam Aadmi Party and individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the lease of Wankhede Stadium to Mumbai Cricke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revised Rank List in LL.M. Medal Dispute — University Directed to Reconsider Based on Original Marks. Petitioner's challenge to revised rank list for June 2012 batch and Nani A. Palkhivala Memorial Gold Medal for 2012 succeeds as court finds lack of notice and opportunity of hearing....

The petitioner, Mrs. Swathi B., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challenging the revised rank list issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Issues Directions to BBMP to Demolish Illegal Construction by Adjoining Landowner for Gross Violation of Building Bye-Laws. BBMP Officials Found to Have Failed in Statutory Duty to Inspect and Enforce Commencement Certificate Requirement Under Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Byelaws 2003 and Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976....

Background: The petition was filed by the owner of property No.8/2, adjacent to respondents 4 and 5's property No.8/1 in Bangalore. The petitioner alleged that respondents 4 and 5 constructed a buildi...