High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Cooperative Society Dispute, Sets Aside Limitation Bar. Correction Deed Does Not Extend Limitation for Challenging Original Sale Deed Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960....

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Santosh Rani Arora and Dharmeshkumar Arora against the order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which dismissed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period....

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Stabbing Incident During Working Hours Held to Arise Out of Employment. Employer Liable for Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 as Burden to Prove Otherwise Not Discharged....

The appeal was filed by the legal representative of the deceased employee, Vitthal, challenging the order of the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, which rejected the claim for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in Criminal Complaint for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 202(1)(a) CrPC. Offence Under Section 315 IPC Exclusively Triable by Sessions Court Requires Magistrate's Personal Inquiry, Not Police Investigation....

The applicants, Sau. Shailja w/o Ambadas Dhanvijay and Ambadas s/o Balakdas Dhanvijay, challenged three orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chandrapur, in Regular Criminal Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents....

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel Alloys Co. of India Ltd., was engaged in the puri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Directing Indemnity for Depreciation Disallowance. Petitioners Argue that Clause 14 of Lease Agreement Does Not Cover Income Tax Depreciation Denial and Rely on Identical Clause Interpretation in Prior Judgment....

The dispute arose from a lease agreement executed in 1997 between Borosil Glass Works Limited (lessee/petitioner) and Tata Motors Limited (lessor/respondent) for Type I and Type II equipment, with the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London....

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959....

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging several orders and notices issued under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court holds that valuation for court fees and jurisdiction is a mixed question of law and fact not to be decided at preliminary stage....

The petitioner, M/s Prism Reality, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 30.07.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Wadgaon Maval,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires....

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 29.08.2006 issued by the Central Board of Excise an...