High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cenvat Credit Case for Mobile Phones. Service Tax Paid on Mobile Phones Used by Employees Held Eligible for Cenvat Credit Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004....

The case is an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowed cenvat credit to the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Return Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Court holds that cause of action arose outside Mumbai and City Civil Court lacked territorial jurisdiction under Section 16 CPC....

The petitioner, Naran Lala Pvt. Ltd., a company based in Navsari, Gujarat, challenged an order dated 25.11.2014 passed by the City Civil Court at Bombay rejecting its application under Order 7 Rule 10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Students to Continue B.Arch Course Despite Exceeding Stipulated Duration Under University Rules, Overriding Council of Architecture Regulations. University of Pune's Rules on Maximum Duration and ATKT Conditions Held Inconsistent with Council of Architecture Regulations, Which Are Binding Under Section 21 of the Architects Act, 1972....

The Bombay High Court dealt with a group of writ petitions filed by students of the Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch) course at the University of Pune, challenging the University's rules that imposed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Recovery Proceedings and Civil Imprisonment Order for Non-Payment of Dues. Recovery Officer's Order for Arrest and Detention of Defaulter Under Section 28A of SEBI Act, 1992 Upheld as Valid Exercise of Powers....

The petitioner, Vinod Hinigorani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of orders dated 18.12.2014 and 29.12.2014 passed by the Recovery Officer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons Against Politician in Defamation Case for Alleged Remarks Against RSS — Statements Not Defamatory as They Did Not Refer to Complainant or Any Identifiable Individual....

The petitioner, Rahul Gandhi, a Member of Parliament and Vice President of the Indian National Congress, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drug-Laced Banana and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 328 and 379 IPC set aside as sole witness failed to identify accused in court and prosecution failed to prove administration of intoxicating substance....

The appellant, Rajesh Jatihusain Ansari, was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 328 (administering stupefying drug with intent to cause hurt) and 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Possession and Removal of Obstruction. Earlier Suit Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit if Cause of Action is Different....

The revision application was filed by the original defendant No.1 against the order of the Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gangapur, dismissing his application under Order II Rule 2 and Order VII Ru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Trust Property Ejectment Suit — Plaint Not Filed by Authorized Person. Suit for ejectment and mesne profits dismissed as the person filing the suit on behalf of the Trust was not duly authorized under the Trust Deed....

The appellant, Sri Shivabalayogi Maharaja Trust, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2014 passed by the V Ad...