High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularisation of Contractual Employee in ITI — No Right to Regularisation Arises from Mere Empanelment in Selection List. The Court held that contractual appointment does not create a right to regularisation, and the petitioner's selection did not guarantee permanent employment....

The petitioner, Gopalkrishna Shantaram Borkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking regularisation of his services as a Watchman at the Cacora Government ITI. He had appli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reduction of Term of District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor. Amendment reducing term from three years to one year held valid; no vested right to continue for full term....

The petitioner, Vikas Baburao Patil Shirgaonkar, was appointed as District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor at Satara on 6th August 2014 for a term of three years. Subsequently, the State of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act — Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Invalid as Full Disclosure Was Made During Original Assessment....

The petitioner, Plus Paper Food Pac Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 18.11.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and an order dated 4.2.2014 rejecting its ob...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Zee Entertainment for Misuse of Confidential TV Show Concept and Copyright Infringement. Plaintiffs established prima facie case of breach of confidence and copyright infringement in concept note for 'Badki Bahu' serial....

The plaintiffs, Beyond Dreams Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, filed a suit against Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. and another for preventing misuse of confidential information and infri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Domestic Violence Case — Life Imprisonment for Killing Wife with Sickle. Appellant's Conviction Under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Confirmed Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence....

The appellant, Krishna Maruti Lohar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of his wife Gangubai under Section 302 IPC and for attempting to murder Dattatraya and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Discharges Director of LIC Housing Finance Limited in Corruption Case — Director Not a Public Servant Under Prevention of Corruption Act. LIC Housing Finance Limited is not a government company or authority, and its director does not fall under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The applicant, Ramchandran Nair, was an employee of LIC and was transferred to LIC Housing Finance Limited (LICHFL) as Chief Executive Officer on 12th April 2008. He was later appointed as Director of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was the wife of co-accused and her testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated....

The appellant, Dinesh Shankar Aakode, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of Krishna and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was that o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Declaration for Power Station Due to Delay Beyond One Year. Section 6 Declaration Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Quashed as Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period from Section 4 Notification....

The petitioner, Madanlal Lalchand Jain, challenged the legality and validity of a declaration under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, issued on 17.8.2013 by respondent Nos. 1, 3, and 4 for ...