High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Business Centre Agreement Dispute. Termination of Agreement Due to Economic Crisis Held Valid; Refund of Security Deposit Upheld....

The appellant, M/s. Pankaj Dyes & Chemicals Ltd., entered into a Business Centre Agreement with the respondent, M/s. Taco Hendrickson Suspensions Pvt Ltd., on 6th May 2008 for a period of six years fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Loan Recovery Disputes. Held that the Cooperative Court had jurisdiction under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and the bank had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 97, making the writ petitions not maintainable....

The petitioner, Pune Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Bank Ltd., filed multiple writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Cooperative Court in disputes filed by various respondent societies. The respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that when a motorcyclist without a helmet collides with a stationary tractor-trolley, contributory negligence must be assessed and compensation reduced proportionately under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of a deceased motorcyclist who died in a collision with a stationary tractor-trolley. The claimants, being the widow, son...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals of Landowners in KIADB Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied as Landowners Failed to Prove Higher Market Value. Landowners sought enhanced compensation for acquired lands but did not produce evidence of higher market value; court upheld Single Judge's dismissal....

The case pertains to 16 landowners (appellants) whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) for industrial development. The Special Land Acquisition Officer aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Denying Enhanced Compensation. Landowners' Claim for Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Rejected as Reference Court's Award Was Not Challenged....

The appellants, landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, sought enhanced compensatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Siblings in Motor Accident Claim, Holds That Dependency Is Not a Condition Precedent for Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal and remanded the matter for fresh assessment of compensation....

The appeal was filed by Farzana and Shoeb, siblings of the deceased Haroon, who died in a motor accident involving a bus owned by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. The mother and broth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Dismissal by Tribunal Set Aside Due to Erroneous Finding on Dependency. Claimants, being sister and brother of deceased, held entitled to compensation under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as legal representatives irrespective of dependency....

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur dated 01/03/2003 dismissing a claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The claim petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Parole Petition for Bypassing Statutory Procedure Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Petitioner Cannot Directly Approach High Court for Parole Without First Applying to Competent Authority Under Rules 18-28....

The petitioner, a prisoner convicted and lodged at Kolhapur Central Prison, filed a writ petition directly before the Bombay High Court seeking parole for 30 days on the ground that his daughter's mar...