High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Police Remand in IMFL Transportation Case — Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Accused Already in Custody and No Recovery Pending. The Court upheld the Magistrate's reasoned order rejecting police remand under Section 167(2) CrPC, finding no necessity for custodial interrogation....

The present criminal revision application was filed by the original accused (petitioners) challenging the order dated 22.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhalod, rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Rejection of Police Remand in IMFL Case — Custodial Interrogation Not Required as Accused in Judicial Custody and No Specific Recovery Pending. Magistrate's Order Rejecting Remand Under Section 167(2) CrPC Upheld as Reasoned and Not Perverse....

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the State of Gujarat against an order of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhalod, dated 22.01.2026, rejecting the police rem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Order of Reinstatement for Rojamdar in Industrial Dispute Case. Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Established Despite Employer's Denial....

The State of Gujarat, through the Range Forest Officer, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Motorcyclist — Applies 50% Deduction for Lack of Driving License and Violation of Traffic Rules...

The case arises from a motor accident on 12.08.2014 when the deceased, Sartanbhai Bhalubhai Rathava, was returning as a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by Jakirhussain. A jeep driven by opponent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Lump Sum Compensation to Legal Heirs of Deceased Daily Wage Worker in Industrial Dispute. Compensation of Rs.1,20,000/- awarded in lieu of reinstatement and backwages for illegal termination due to non-availability of work....

The petitioner, Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service, challenged the award dated 24.11.2021 passed by the Labour Court, Ahmedabad in Reference (LCA) No.625 of 2004. The respondent, Mansuri Firozabanu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partnership Accounts Suit — Concurrent Findings of Plaint Rejection Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Upheld. Suit for Accounts of Partnership Firm Held Barred by Limitation and Not Maintainable as No Proper Notice Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act Was Proved....

The appellant-plaintiff filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent findings of the courts below. The trial court had rejected the plaint i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Tribunal's error in deducting only 10% instead of 20% contributory negligence corrected; compensation reduced accordingly....

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of the deceased who died in a collision between his car and a truck on 24.05.2010. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses PIL Against Private School for Lack of Bonafide Interest and Non-Disclosure of Credentials. Court holds that petitioners residing in different districts without disclosing their occupations or motive cannot maintain a public interest litigation against a private school....

The present petition was filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by three petitioners, with petitioner no.1 residing in District Mehsana and petitioners no.2 and 3 residing in District Ahmedabad. ...