High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Registration of FIR in Domestic Violence Case — Police Directed to Register FIR and Investigate. Failure to Act on Cognizable Complaint Violates Right to Access Justice Under Article 226....

The petitioner, Brinda Kush Shah, through her father and power of attorney holder, filed a Special Criminal Application under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking directions to the police to regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Appeal by Claimant for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Awards Additional Rs.48,706 for Future Loss of Income and Pain and Suffering. Court Adds 40% Future Prospect Under Pranay Sethi and Enhances Pain and Suffering, Applying Minimum Wages and Multiplier Principles....

The appeal arose under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 04.06.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchmahals at Godhra, in MAC Peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partly Allows Appeal Against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Award, Enhances Compensation for 16% Disability. Future Prospects at 40% Added for Self-Employed Claimant Aged 37, and Pain and Suffering Enhanced to Rs.10,000; Insurance Company Directed to Pay Additional Rs.48,706....

The judgment concerns an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 filed by the injured claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal by UPSRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Proved. Deceased motorcyclist died due to rash driving of UPSRTC bus; Tribunal's award of Rs. 1,04,00,000/- with 9% interest upheld....

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 22.10.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Ahmedabad in MACP No.174 of 2016. The appellant, Uttar Pradesh State Road Tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal by UPSRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Proved. Corporation Liable as Owner of Offending Vehicle Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellant, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC), filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 22.10.2024 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal of Claimants in Motor Accident Case — Negligence of Scooter Driver Cannot Be Attributed to Pillion Rider. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.2,51,325 to Rs.9,26,800 for Death of 28-Year-Old Mason in Bus Collision Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Bhikhaji Thakor, was a pillion rider on a scooter that was hit by a Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation bus. The accident occurred ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Immoral Traffic Offender Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(g) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Smit @Sumit Satishbhai Darji, was preventively detained by an order dated 01/02/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Vadodara, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Bhikhabhai Zalabhai Bharwad, was preventively detained by the District Magistrate, Gandhinagar, under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985, as a '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Section 2(b) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention....

The petitioner, Hussain @ Husain Khatri, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Surat, vide order dated 23/01/2026, as a bootlegger under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of impact on public order....

The petitioner, Jay @ Bhuro Kirtibhai Panchal, through his wife Priyanka Jay Panchal, challenged the preventive detention order dated 23/01/2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad, under the...