High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 32A Renders Prosecution Invalid. Failure to Obtain Mandatory Previous Sanction from State Government or Authorized Authority Before Filing Complaint Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Makes Entire Proceedings Void Ab Initio....

The petitioner, Rajendra s/o Madhav Pate, was the original accused in Summary Criminal Case No. 671 of 2014 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Chalisgaon, instituted by the Police S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears writ petition against rejection of techno-commercial bid in bivalent oral polio vaccine tender. Petitioners alleged arbitrariness and favoritism in awarding contract to third respondent, citing violation of CVC Guidelines....

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corporation Ltd. (Respondent No.1) to reject the t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Arson and Murder Case. Accused Challenged Conviction Under Sections 302, 436, 342, 143, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC; State Filed Appeal Seeking Enhancement of Sentence....

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjudicated eight criminal appeals filed against the judgment dated 9 May 2005 by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Criminal Case Nos. 107 of 2004 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Industrial Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Directing Employer to Pay for Workmen's Defence Advocate. No Statutory Obligation on Employer to Bear Cost of Advocate for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971....

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, Thane, in Revision Application (ULP) No.28 of 2016...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Employer to Bear Advocate Costs for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 — Held that Industrial Court exceeded jurisdiction by imposing financial burden on employer without legal basis....

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, in Revision Application (ULP) No.28 of 2016. The Industrial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Guardianship Case as Minor Attained Majority — Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Inapplicable to Adult Aged 47 Years. The court held that the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 applies only to minors, and since the alleged ward was 47 years old, the proceedings were not maintainable....

The appellant, Suresh Damu Patil, challenged an order passed by the learned District Judge-II, Bhusaval, dated 2nd April 2016, in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.67/2015. The respondent no.2, Bhagw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination Clause in Employment Contract. Clause 12(c)(ii) allowing termination without cause held not unconscionable or contrary to public policy under Section 23 of Indian Contract Act, 1872....

The petitioner, Ms. Jayshree Gururaj, was appointed as Senior Director (Advanced Services) in Cisco Systems (India) Private Limited on 15 May 2012. Her employment was governed by a contract which incl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Tribunal Order Setting Aside Transfer of Government Employee — Transfer Order Not Passed by Competent Authority. Court Held That Transfer Must Be in Accordance with Rules and Guidelines, and Non-Compliance Renders the Order Invalid....

The petitioner, K.G. Jagadeesha, an Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department, challenged the order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal dated 17.08.2016 in Application No.7423/2016,...