High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties — Compromise Reached After Mediation, Court Finds No Purpose in Continuing Prosecution Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act....

The petitioners, Arvind s/o Pyarelal Jain and Smt. Sarita w/o Arvind Jain, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of FIR No. 438 of 2016 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Club Licence Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review sought against order requiring club to obtain licence under Section 176 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963; court held that review is not an appeal and no ground for review exists....

The petitioner, D.V.R.Recreation Club (a unit of Janege Green Gardens Private Limited), filed a review petition under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Partition Suit Appeal — Order I Rule 10 CPC. Subsequent purchaser held to be necessary and proper party to appeal under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908....

The petitioner, Sri Basavaraj @ Madhu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 20.12.2013 passed by the II Additional District and Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Remand Order in Gausiya Masjid Dispute. Court upholds Tribunal's decision to remand matter to Waqf Board for fresh hearing, finding no jurisdictional error or illegality in the impugned order....

The case involves a civil revision application filed by eleven applicants against an order of the Waqf Tribunal. The dispute pertains to Gausiya Masjid in Yavatmal. The Chief Executive Officer of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Insurance Appeals Challenging Tribunal Awards on Multiplier and Future Prospects; Decision Not Provided in Excerpt....

The Bombay High Court heard three first appeals filed by insurance companies challenging awards passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. In First Appeal No. 738 of 2015, the deceased Vijaysingh Rajp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government's Refusal to Appoint Selected Judicial Candidate Based on Adverse Police Report Without Opportunity of Hearing. Selection Process for Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class Must Be Fair and Transparent....

The petitioner, Suhas Arun Malve, an advocate since 2004, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class in Maharashtra. He was selected by the Maharashtra P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Appoint Recommended Candidate for Judicial Service — Failure to Disclose Adverse Material Violates Natural Justice. The Court Quashed Communications Denying Appointment and Directed Reconsideration After Providing Opportunity of Hearing....

The petitioner, Suhas Arun Malve, an advocate practicing since 2004, applied for the post of Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class in Maharashtra. He was selected by the Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Government Officers Challenging Lokayukta Report for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Grant Hearing Under Section 10 of Maharashtra Lokayukta Act, 1971 Renders Report Unsustainable....

The petitioners, officers of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the report/recommendation of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 26 September 2011 in case No.LO/Com/2686/2009 (T1) and the consequent le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lokayukta Report for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Hearing Before Adverse Recommendations Against Government Officers. Section 10 of Maharashtra Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayuktas Act, 1971 Requires Opportunity of Hearing Before Making Report....

The petitioners, officers of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the report/recommendation of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 26 September 2011 and the consequent letter dated 23 May 2013 issued by ...