High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit Despite Concluded Evidence — Due Diligence Requirement Satisfied. The Court upheld the Trial Court's order permitting amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as the plaintiff had no prior knowledge of the defendant's directorships and the amendment was necessary to determine comparative hardship....

The petitioner, Vinod Gopalan Puthanpure, challenged an order dated 21/06/2017 passed by the Trial Court in R.C.S. No. 186/2010, which allowed the respondent/plaintiff Jyoti Anil Shah to amend her pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Employee in School Service Dispute - Appointment Not Made as Per Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977. School Tribunal's Dismissal of Appeal on Preliminary Issues Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication on Merits....

The appellant, Girdhar Anandrao Thaori, an employee of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Shikshan Sanstha, filed an appeal before the School Tribunal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Upholding Compensation Awarded by Tribunal. Unexplained Delay in Filing FIR Held Not Fatal When Negligence Is Undisputed, and Treating Doctor's Permanent Disability Certificate Accepted Despite Refusal by Government Medical Board....

This was a first appeal preferred by Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Ltd. against the award dated 17 February 2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Wardha, in a claim petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 120-B, 203 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence....

The appellant, Dinesh Thakare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Chandrapur, for the murder of his wife Harsha under Sections 302, 201, 120-B and 203 of the Indian Penal Code, based on circumstanti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Order in Service Matter Due to Fraud and Misrepresentation by Management. Petitioner's Termination Set Aside as Enquiry Committee Was Not Properly Constituted Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977....

The applicant, a former Headmistress of Savitribai Fule Vidyalaya, Masod, was initially appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 2nd September 1987. After 10 years of service, she was promoted as Headmist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind Due to Mechanical Translation of Documents. Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority failed to consider translated documents before passing order....

The petitioner, Taufiq Ismail Shaikh @ Pailwan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 20.03.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder by Burning in Illicit Relationship Dispute. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed based on dying declarations and medical evidence despite minor discrepancies....

The appellant, Sanjay Bapurao Sasne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ichalkaranji, for the murder of Savitri Chandrakant Londhe under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice....

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show Cause Notice dated 22-7-2016 issued by the Foreign ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Restoration of Suit Despite Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(f) CPC — Power to Restore Exists Under Order VII Rule 13 CPC. The Court held that rejection under Order VII Rule 11(f) is not a decree and the Trial Court has jurisdiction to restore the suit upon sufficient cause being shown....

The case arises from a dispute between family members over property. The Plaintiff (Respondent No.1) filed Special Civil Suit No.30/2012 seeking partition and separate possession of ancestral property...