High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Encroacher Seeking Land Exchange. Encroacher Cannot Claim Exchange of Land as an Absolute Right; Government Land Encroachment Must Be Evicted Following Due Process....

The petitioner, Mariammal, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15.08.2024 passed by the Thasildar (3rd respondent) rejecting her claim for exchange of land. The petitioner was an encroach...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Encroacher Seeking Land Exchange. Encroacher Cannot Claim Exchange of Land as an Absolute Right; Government Land Encroachment Must Be Evicted Following Due Process....

The petitioner, Mariammal, filed a writ petition before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 15.08.2024 passed by the Thasildar (third respondent) rejecting her claim for exchange of land....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ of Mandamus Against Encroachment on Government Poramboke Tank Land. Civil Suit Against Show Cause Notice Under Section 131 of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 Held Not Maintainable Due to Statutory Bar Under Section 9 CPC....

The petitioner, Pappathi, filed a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court seeking a direction to the District Collector, Tahsildar, and Executive Engineer (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal Against Review Order as Not Maintainable — Review Order Cannot Be Challenged When Original Writ Petition Order Has Become Final...

The present intra-court appeal was filed by the Management of Irudhukottai Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. against an order dated 12.03.2025 dismissing their Review Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999....

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rectification/expungement of the registered trademark ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Application in Service Promotion Dispute — No Error Apparent in Earlier Order. Review jurisdiction cannot be used for re-adjudication of merits; non-consideration of grounds does not constitute error apparent....

The present Review Application was filed by E. Murali and G. Muniratnam (the 2nd applicant was already dismissed as withdrawn) seeking review of an order dated 24.11.2021 passed in W.A.No.844 of 2013....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Application for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Review Applicant Attempted to Re-argue Merits, Which Is Impermissible Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC....

The present review application was filed by A.Selva Sharma seeking to review the order dated 06.01.2022 passed by the Madras High Court in W.A.No.1656 of 2016. The applicant attempted to re-argue the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order in Goonda Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority's Reliance on Irrelevant Bail Order Without Similar Facts Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982....

The petitioner, Karishma Kapoor, wife of the detenu Sai Sudhahar @ Sudhahar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wager in Industrial Dispute. Lump sum compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs awarded for termination of daily wager without following procedure under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947....

The appellant, Rajeshbhai Danabhai Dangar, was a workman employed as a peon-cum-sweeper by United India Assurance Co. Ltd. He claimed to have worked from August 2000 to June 2006, but the Labour Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Interest on Suspension Period Amount Due to Delay in Seeking Reinstatement. Appellant's Own Delay in Reporting for Duty After Acquittal Disentitles Him to Interest on Differential Amount Paid on Reinstatement....

The appellant, Riteshkumar Narendrabhai Patel, was an Assistant Teacher who was arrested on 09.02.2005 and suspended on 28.06.2005. He was enlarged on bail on 02.08.2005 and ultimately acquitted by th...