High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty on Arbitrator's Interim Order. The court held that an order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not an 'award' under Article 11 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and thus no stamp duty is payable....

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.08.2018 passed by the City Civil and Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compassionate Appointment — No Right to Claim After Lapse of Scheme and Inordinate Delay. The court held that compassionate appointment is not a vested right and cannot be granted under a lapsed scheme....

The petitioner, Mehboob, son of Syed Hussain, a 'D' Group employee in the Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Karnataka State Adm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Retired Judge as Arbitrator After Respondents Failed to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Invocation of Arbitration Clause....

The petitioner, M/s Shri. Narasimhaswami Constructions, a partnership firm, entered into a contract agreement with the respondents, the South Western Railway, for construction works titled 'Arsiker-Bi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause....

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes with the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Stamp Duty Dispute Over Arbitral Interim Order. Court Holds That an Order Under Section 17 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Is Not an 'Award' Under Article 11 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and Thus No Stamp Duty Is Payable....

The petitioners, Mrs. Shaila Mathias and Mrs. Yasmine Felix, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.08.2018 passed by the City Civil and Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt....

The judgment concerns five criminal appeals filed by multiple appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of one person. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Revision and State's Revision Against Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Bribe Demand and Acceptance Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The case involves two criminal revision applications arising from an order of the Special Judge, Bhandara, discharging the accused Kunda Motiramji Bodalkar in Special Criminal Case No. 7/2015 under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintenance of Rs.1500 per Month in Domestic Violence Case. The court held that the wife is entitled to maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the quantum is not excessive....

The case involves a wife, Mrunal Talmale, who filed an application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking maintenance from her husband and in-laws. The Judicial Magist...