High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Allows Bail Appeal by Accused in SC/ST Act Murder Case, Setting Aside Trial Court's Dismissal of Bail Application. Appellant's Role Limited to Conveying Information Based on Co-accused's Confession; Similarly Placed Co-accused Granted Bail by Supreme Court....

The High Court of Judicature at Madras considered a criminal appeal filed by the appellant, Monnaiyan @ Duraisamy, under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Challenging Customs Broker's Penalty Under Section 114AA, Questions Jurisdiction Over MEIS Classification. Three substantial questions of law framed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1944 regarding the authority of customs to penalise for MEIS scrip classification and applicability of Section 28/28AAA....

The matter concerned an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1944 before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, filed by a licensed Customs Broker against the final order of the Customs, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability Assessed at 100% Due to Vegetative State. Claimant awarded Rs.2,72,00,000/- for loss of earning capacity, medical expenses, pain and suffering, attendant charges, future medical expenses, and loss of amenities under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The appellant, Mohamed Adhil Nifras, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996....

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment and order dated 11.09....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order for Psychiatric Examination of Wife in Divorce Case — No Prima Facie Material to Justify Medical Examination Under Hindu Marriage Act. The Court held that a party cannot be compelled to undergo psychiatric evaluation based on mere allegations of mental disorder without supporting evidence....

The case arises from a divorce petition filed by the husband (respondent) under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) and (iii)(a)&(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking divorce on the ground that the wife (pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit Plaintiffs' Writ, Restores Injunction Against Alienation of Joint Family Property. Trial Court's Order Granting Temporary Injunction Under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC Was Properly Passed and Appellate Court Erred in Reversing It Without Considering Prima Facie Case of Joint Tenancy....

The petitioners, Rohit and Radha Panbisare, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit property, including land Gat no.224 and a house constructed thereon, situated at village Tisgaon,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Parole Application for Want of Jurisdiction - Abu Salem's Parole Plea Rejected as Filed Before Wrong Court. The court held that the petition was not maintainable as it was filed before the wrong bench, and the convict must approach the appropriate court having jurisdiction over the prison where he is confined....

The petitioner, Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari, a convict currently confined in Nashik Road Central Prison, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking parole. The petitioner was represe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST with Interest for Zero-Rated Export Supplies Under CGST and IGST Acts. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST paid on export of goods along with interest from date of shipping bill till actual refund....

The petitioner, Shri Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petitioner sought a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Appeals in GST Case Despite Limitation Bar — Deficiency Memo Not Issued. Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 Mandates Issuance of Deficiency Memo and Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejecting Refund Application; Appellate Authority Must Consider Limitation Issue on Merits....

The petitioner, K Line India Pvt. Ltd., a company providing shipping services, filed refund applications for IGST paid on zero-rated supplies to SEZ units in December 2017. The refund application was ...