High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute — Limitation Period Runs from End of Loan Tenure When Creditor Has Option to Recall Loan on Default....

The petitioner, Paresh Prakash Pavetekar, had taken a loan from the respondent, Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd., repayable in equated monthly installments. The petitioner defaulted on an installment due on 5 No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice by Municipal Corporation and Defence Authorities. Examines if NOC from Defence is Required for Building Completion Under Town Planning and Municipal Acts....

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment of a Category A cessed building known as Rashid Mansion on land bearing CS No. 63 of Colaba Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018...

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop work notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard Writ Petition Challenging Order on Locus Standi Under Section 41-D of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Trust and Trustees Contested Tenant's Status as Person Having Interest to Maintain Application for Removal of Trustees Based on Leasehold Rights and Relationship as Grandson of Settlor....

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arose from an order dated 7 April 2018 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Mumbai, holding that the respondent is a person having...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-based insult alleged in private setting fails to attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989....

The applicants, Tukaram s/o Bhagwan Sawant and Saraswati w/o Tukaram Sawant, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bombay High Court, Aurang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Found to Be an Afterthought in a Property Dispute Under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989....

The appellant, Kadubal Govind Gore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, challenging the order dated 26-10-2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pre-Arrest Bail in SC/ST Act Case for Alleged Kidnapping to Recover Debt. Court holds that bar under Section 18 of SC/ST Act does not apply when allegations under the Act are not prima facie made out, as dominant intent was recovery of money and victim not a member of SC/ST....

The appellant, Udhav Gyanoba Budhwant, filed an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Act of 1989) challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Intent to Humiliate on Caste Basis. Mere use of caste name without intent to insult does not attract Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act, 1989....

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Krishna Gaikwad, Aniket Bhosale, and Nandkishor Mutkule against a common order of the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, rejecting the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape and Unnatural Offence on 3-Year-Old Girl. Testimony of Minor Victim Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f) and 377 IPC....

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from the conviction of Patiram Gangaram Shelokar for the rape and unnatural offence committed on a 3-year-old girl. The incident occurred on 10 October 2011...