High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains MMRDA from Taking Coercive Actions in Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Demand for Construction Delay; Lease Deed Clauses on Time Limit and Additional Built-Up Area Interpreted...

The petitioners, Raghuleela Builders Private Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the demand letters and recovery notices issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Continuing Breach of Settlement Not Barred by Limitation Under MRTU & PULP Act. Non-Payment of Monthly Dues Constitutes Fresh Cause of Action Each Month, Complaint Filed Within 90 Days of Last Refusal....

The Petitioner, Jaihind Sahakari Pani Purvatha Mandali Ltd., a registered co-operative society supplying water to agriculturists, challenged a judgment and order of the Industrial Court at Kolhapur da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Petition Challenging CAT Order on Pay Refixation. Repatriated Employee Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Enjoyed in Ex-Cadre Post, Refixation Set Aside....

The Union of India and railway authorities (petitioners) challenged an order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench, in O.A.No.992/2015. The respondent, S Ravi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC based solely on testimony of sole interested witness without corroboration held unsustainable....

The petitioners, accused Nos.2, 3 and 5, were convicted by the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Madhugiri in C.C.No.957/2009 for offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Order Removing Lands from Mining Lease in Mineral Auction Dispute. Transfer of Mining Lease Valid Under Rule 22(6) of MCR 1960, State Cannot Unilaterally Excise Lease Area for Auction Without Following Due Process....

The petitioner, M/s. J.K. Cement Limited, held a mining lease (ML No. 2344A) over certain lands in Metagudda Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District, which was originally granted to Mysore Minerals L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape....

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Anna Sose, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Trial No.89/1998 for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Examines Challenge by Zilla Parishad to Industrial Court Orders Granting Regularisation to ANM Workers. Court Considers Whether Temporary Appointees Under Bond Scheme Entitled to Regularisation Under GR Dated 02.05.2009....

The petitioners, being authorities of the Zilla Parishad, Gondia, filed writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra, Bhandara Bench, which had directed regularisation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Unverified In-Camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug offenders, Dangerous persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981....

The petitioner, Lakhan Rohidas Jagtap, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15 March 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in PC Act Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt....

The appellant, Prakash Babulal Pardeshi, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nashik, in Special Case No.11 of 2012 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC as Complainant's Testimony Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Cause of Death....

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 22nd April 1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, acquitting the respondents (Vijay Babruhan Dhankude, Sunil...