High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to SARFAESI Sale Notice as Infructuous. Sale Notice Became Redundant and Objections to Demand Notice Already Replied by Bank, No Further Relief Granted....

The petitioner, M/s Sri Guru Raghavendra Agro Foods Rice Mill, a partnership firm represented by its partner Y. Sharanappa Shetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Section 364A IPC. Court finds no demand for ransom or threat to kill, essential for Section 364A IPC, and grants bail under Section 439 CrPC....

The petitioner, Manjunatha @ Manju, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime No.89/2020 registered by Tavarekere Police Station,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Preliminary Notification Under KIAD Act — Petitioner's Land Covered by Prior Judgment. Court Disposes Petition in Terms of Earlier Order Quashing Notification Dated 21-07-1999 Under Section 28(1) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966....

The petitioner, Smt. Lakshmamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the preliminary notification dated 21-07-1999 issued under Section 28...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Deemed Conversion Application Under Section 95(9) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Stone Crushing Activity. The court held that the authority must process the application for deemed conversion of agricultural land within four weeks....

The petitioner, H.N. Venu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Adyaksha and Upadyaksha — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 as No Prior Notice Required for Special Meeting Convened by Prescribed Authority...

The petitioners, who are members of Somaguddi Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Adyaksha (C.L. Satish Babu) and Upadyaksha (Yashodamma) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Landowners' Petition Declaring Acquisition Lapsed Under BDA Act and RFCTLARR Act. Acquisition Initiated in 1988 and Finalized in 1994 Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Under Section 27 of BDA Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013....

The petitioners, Sri M Nagesh Reddy, Smt M Sathya Reddy, and Sri M Devendra, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under SC/ST Act — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out Against Accused Nos. 2 and 3. Court found that the role attributed to petitioners was not specific and they were not named in the FIR, leading to grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C....

The petitioners, Sri Umesh and Sri Hanumantharayappa, accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Spl.C.C.No.213/2019 pending before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, filed a crimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Tender Matter — Petitioners Seek Participation in Tender Process but Counsel Does Not Press Petition. Petitioners' counsel submitted that he does not press the petition and undertook to send a memo for withdrawal; court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits....

The petitioners, three concrete products firms, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the respondent, the Managing Director of MESCOM, to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs BBMP to Consider Representation Against Illegal Dispossession — Petitioners Seek Protection of Possession Over Schedule Property. Court Orders Respondent No.2 to Consider Representation Dated 06.02.2020 and Pass Orders Within Four Weeks....

The petitioners, K.M. Sadiq and Rafi Ulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. They sought to restrain the re...