High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Application Under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A for Non-Prosecution. Restoration of Application Granted as Plaintiff Was Not Given Sufficient Opportunity to Be Heard....

The appellant, Shantinath, was the plaintiff in O.S.No.306/2007 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Indi. He filed an interlocutory application I.A.No.XVIII under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 498-A and 302 IPC for Dowry Death by Burning. Trial court's conviction based on two dying declarations and eyewitness testimony, and forensic report falsifying accidental stove burst defence, was upheld....

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.311 of 2013, where the appellant was found guilty of offences under Sections 498-A and 302 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Criminal Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120B, 302 r/w 34 IPC. Appeals Challenge Reliability of Eye-Witness Identification and Dying Declaration, Along with Conspiracy Evidence Against Accused Nos. 4 to 6....

The Bombay High Court heard five criminal appeals arising out of Sessions Case No.164 of 2011 decided by the Sessions Judge, Solapur on 8 May 2014. The appellants had been convicted under Sections 120...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Recalling Application Maintainable in Criminal Procedure Case Due to Suppression of Charge-Sheet Filing. Non-Disclosure of Committal and Charge-Sheet While Seeking Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC Vitiated Discretionary Relief and Section 362 CrPC Bar Did Not Apply....

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, considered an application for recalling its earlier judgment dated 04/04/2018, which had quashed FIR No. 239/2017 registered at Police Station Mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examined Victim Compensation Claim Under Section 357A CrPC in Corrosive Substance Burn Case. Court Considered Whether Burn Victim Could Be Treated at Par with Acid Attack Victims Under Manodhairya Compensation Scheme and State's Duty to Provide Rehabilitation....

The petitioner, a resident of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to grant her compensation by treating her bur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal Against Motor Accident Compensation Award Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Accident Arose Out of Use of Motor Vehicle When Pedestrian Was Hit by Iron Bars Unloaded from Stationary Lorry, Falling Within Section 165(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The matter arose from a motor accident claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The respondent no.1 was employed as a salesman in a gift centre in Ghatkopar, Mumbai. On 15 September 2002, while walki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court considered writ petition challenging MSME Facilitation Council award and constitutional validity of Section 16 of MSMED Act. Petitioner contended council lacked jurisdiction and award invalid due to missing signature of Chairman....

The writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between JSW Steel Ltd. (formerly Ispat Metallics India Ltd.) as petitioner and Kamlakar V. Salvi, proprietor of M/s. Krunal Engineering Works, as res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Trial Court's Rejection of Witness Summons to Adversary in Partition Suit. Trial Court's Order Upheld That a Party Cannot Call Its Adversary as Its Own Witness Under Order XVI Rule 1 and Rule 21 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908....

The litigation arose from a suit for partition, possession and perpetual injunction instituted by the original plaintiffs, whose predecessor Digambar had died and whose legal representatives came on r...