High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt....

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against order No.A/10670-10673/2019 dated 11th April, 2019...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Receiver's Appointment in Embezzlement Suit. Third Party Claimants Not Party to Suit Cannot Have Receiver Appointed Over Their Properties Without Trial....

The appeal arose from an order dated 5th September 2019 passed by a learned Single Judge (R.I. Chagla J.) on a motion filed by the original plaintiff (Edit II Productions) in Suit No. 461 of 2010. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act....

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 for offences under Sections 363, 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidity Orders in Thakar Tribe Certificate Cases. Held that the Committee failed to consider relevant documents and applied incorrect principles, violating principles of natural justice....

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by members of the Chitale family challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Committee, Aurangabad, which invalidated their Thaka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows BMTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Motorcyclist. Liability Apportioned Equally Between BMTC and Deceased, Compensation Reduced to Rs.39,55,000/- with 6% Interest....

The appeal was filed by the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) challenging the judgment and award dated 17.09.2016 passed by the IX Additional Small Causes and Motor Accident Claims T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Magistrate's Order Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for Lack of Application of Mind — Private Complaint Filed Under Section 200 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Converted to Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Without Recording Reasons. The Magistrate's mechanical order directing investigation without reasons was set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration....

The petitioner, Shivakumar, filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. in PCR No.164/2022 before the JMFC Court, Vijaypura, alleging that his son and his friend were assaulted by respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 CrPC to Quash Rejection of Surety in Murder Case. Court Directs Acceptance of Surety and Release of Accused Despite Non-Local Surety Objection....

The petitioner, Sunil Kamble, was accused No.1 in Crime No.55/2021 registered at Mahagaon Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. He was granted bai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Arbitrary Dismissal by Tribunal — Compensation Awarded for Injuries Sustained in Jeep Accident. The Tribunal's dismissal of the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was set aside as arbitrary, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration on merits....

The appellant, Shivanand S/o Mahadev Bannur, an advocate by profession, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and Additional...