High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Rejecting Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Service Termination Suit. Plaintiff's Cause of Action Arose at Nagpur Where She Worked and Was Terminated, Conferring Jurisdiction on Nagpur Courts Under Section 20(c) CPC....

The respondent/plaintiff, Mrs. Archana Dongre, was employed as a Relationship Manager with HDFC Bank Limited at its Nagpur branch. Her services were terminated on 28 February 2017. She filed Special C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Rental Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Petitioner entitled to rental compensation from date of possession till award under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land taken for octroi post....

The petitioner, M/s. Devi Construction LLP, owned lands in survey Nos.10 (part), 11 (part) and 160 (part) of Village Wakad, Taluka Mulshi, Dist. Pune, which were included within the limits of Pimpri C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership....

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing its application for in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside....

The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th September 2022. The petitioners, Shri Mahavir Develop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act....

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 May 2022 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Smal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions....

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 July 2021, three unknown individuals were added as ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution....

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of sub-section (2) of Section 479 of the Mumbai Muni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit Against Principal Borrower Despite Moratorium Against Guarantors Under IBC. The court permitted the plaintiff to proceed only against defendant no.1 (principal borrower) while reserving rights against guarantors under moratorium....

The plaintiff, IL & FS Financial Services Limited, filed a commercial summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recover Rs. 203,66,31,506/- from the defendants. The suit ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Defendants’ Interim Applications for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Suit on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Section 12-A Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Bar Under SARFAESI Act. Applications Filed by Financial Institution Defendants Against Real Estate Borrower Group....

The dispute arises from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiffs against three defendants, seeking specific performance of a Framework Agreement dated 20 December 2024. The plaintiffs are part of the...