High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Reduces Sentence to Period Already Undergone in Housebreaking and Theft Case — Petitioner Conceded Guilt, Sought Modification of Sentence. Court Held That Where Petitioner Does Not Challenge Conviction and Has Already Undergone Substantial Imprisonment, Sentence Can Be Reduced to Period Already Undergone Under Sections 457/34 and 380/34 IPC....

The revision petitioner, K. Balamurugan, was prosecuted before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli, for offences under Sections 457 read with 34 and 380 read with 34 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 449, 506(ii) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt....

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Parthiban @ Logaraj and Gowtham @ Gowthaman (Accused Nos. 1 and 2) challenging their conviction and sentence by the Principal Sessions Court, Karur in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows SIPCOT's Appeal in Lease Dispute, Sets Aside Writ Order Directing Execution of Lease Deed Without Pre-Conditions. The court held that the writ court cannot rewrite contractual terms and that the respondent must comply with allotment conditions before seeking execution of the lease deed....

The appellant, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), filed a writ appeal against an order dated 24.02.2023 in W.P.No.1745/2015. The respondent, M/s Madhucon Granites Limited, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal by Temple Trust in Rent Recovery Suit Against Tenant. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Failure to Frame Proper Points and Perverse Findings....

The Plaintiff, Sri Veeraraghavaswamy Devasthanam, represented by its Honorary Agent, filed a suit for recovery of arrears of rent against the Defendant, Murugesan, who was a tenant of a vacant land of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Eviction Suit by Temple Trust Against Tenant's Son. Tenant's Son Cannot Claim Tenancy Rights After Father's Death Without Attornment or Consent of Landlord....

The plaintiff, Sri Veeraraghavaswamy Devasthanam, a temple trust, owned a 25-cent vacant land in Ikkadu Village, Tiruvallur. The property was leased to the defendant's father, Sundara Nadar, under a M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Admits Second Appeal on Legality of Rent Enhancement by Devasthanam. Tenant Contended Enhancement was Unreasonable and Sought to Introduce Additional Documents to Challenge Plaintiff's Title....

The plaintiff, Sri Veerarghavaswamy Devasthanam, a temple managed by a hereditary trustee, filed a suit for recovery of rent arrears amounting to Rs.13,500 together with interest against the defendant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition Quashing Recovery from Gratuity in Pay Fixation Error Case. Recovery of Excess Payment Made to Deceased Government Employee Without Notice Violates Natural Justice and Cannot Be Deducted from Death Gratuity....

The petitioner, Jayshri w/o Sanjay Chandode, is the widow of Sanjay Bhagirath Chandode, a government employee who worked as a peon in the office of Respondent No. 3, Regional Deputy Director, Groundwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt...

The appellant, Amol Jayram Landge, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge-2, Hingoli, in Special Case (POCSO) No. 34 of 2019 for offences under Section 6 of the Protection of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client....

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Securities Limited) against Sukhadeo Gorakha Bhil. The...