High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CGHS Reimbursement Claim for Emergency Treatment Without Prior Referral. Petitioner's husband admitted in emergency to empanelled hospital; denial of balance reimbursement set aside....

The petitioner, Bina Saxena, is the widow of a Central Government pensioner who was a beneficiary of the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS). Her husband suffered from chronic kidney disorder and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order Directing Displaced Officer to Resume Post Without Hearing Petitioner. Transfer Order Upheld as Petitioner Had Already Taken Charge, Violating Principles of Natural Justice....

The Petitioner, Shri Rajendra s/o Maruti Najan, was posted as Tahsildar (Revenue) in Collector Office, Nashik since 23 April 2020. By order dated 12 April 2023, one Shri Parmeshwar Ankushrao Kasule wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Conversion of Probate to Letters of Administration in Testamentary Suit. The court held that the right to sue survives to legal representatives of deceased executor and that probate proceedings can be converted to letters of administration under the Indian Succession Act, 1925....

The judgment arises from two interim applications filed by Deepika S. Panicker and others, claiming to be legal heirs of the deceased appellant Kunjumon Shivarajan Panicker. The original suit was file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Appeal — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual terms is final and not open to reappraisal in appeal unless perverse or contrary to public policy....

The case involves two connected commercial appeals arising from an arbitral dispute between Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. (ARCIL) and Manyata Developers Pvt. Ltd. The appellant, ARCIL, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Cancellation of Release Deed — Plaint Not Liable for Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as Cause of Action Disclosed. Allegations of Fraud and Misrepresentation in Obtaining Release Deed Constitute a Valid Cause of Action, and the Court Cannot Look into Defense at the Stage of Order VII Rule 11 CPC....

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent herein) seeking cancellation of a registered release deed dated 01.07.2019, alleging that the defendants (petitioners) obtained the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition in Property Declaration Suit — Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. Court holds that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the plaintiff's claim is based on a different title and the earlier decree is challenged as not binding....

The case arises from a civil revision petition filed by the petitioner (defendant No.1 in the original suit) challenging the order dated 02.06.2022 passed by the XXVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Case for Unauthorised Sub-Lease and Nuisance Under Karnataka Rent Act. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With as Tenant Sub-Let Without Consent and Caused Nuisance to Neighbours Under Section 27(2)(a) and (r) of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999....

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute. The respondent-landlord (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) filed HRC No.16/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru, seeking evi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Single Judge Order Quashing Mutation Entry Based on Void Sale Deed. Land Belonging to Scheduled Tribe Cannot Be Alienated Without Permission Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and Section 4 of Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978....

The appellant, Erappa, sold land bearing Sy.No.5/1 measuring 3 acres situated at Alla Nagar, Koppal Taluk and District, to respondent No.3, Suresh, vide registered sale deed dated 09.03.2005. Subseque...