High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Allowing Voluntary Retirement of Assistant. Rule 48-A of CCS Pension Rules Prevails Over Administrative Circulars and Fundamental Rule 56(k)(1) — Employer's Rejection on Grounds of Staff Shortage Held Arbitrary....

The Union of India and others (petitioners) challenged the order dated 01.03.2024 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which allowed the original application of Satish Namdeorao Andra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Comunidade's Challenge to RTI Orders — Holds Comunidades Not Public Authorities Under RTI Act. Administrative tutelage under Code of Comunidades does not make Comunidades 'public authorities' under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and no officer can be deemed a Public Information Officer....

The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging orders under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) that directed Comunidades (village communities in Goa) to provi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Denial of Approval for Assistant Teacher Appointment Due to Non-Compliance with Recruitment Rules. Appointment Not Through Pavitra Portal and Advertisement in Weekly Newspaper Not Sufficient Under Rule 9(2A) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981....

The petitioner, appointed as an assistant teacher on 1st June 2018 at Sane Guruji Vidhya Mandir, challenged the order dated 21st September 2023 of the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Jalg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Default Bail Appeals in UAPA Case — Extension of Investigation Time Valid Despite Procedural Irregularities. Supreme Court Had Restored Extension Order, Charge-Sheet Filed Within Extended Period, Hence No Indefeasible Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC....

The case involves two criminal appeals challenging a common order dated 28th June 2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Greater Mumbai, rejecting applications for default bail under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election of Respondent No. 4 to GFA Executive Committee — Disqualification Under Article 27 of GFA Statutes Requires Both Being Charged and Charges Framed for Non-Bailable Offence. The court held that since charges were not framed before compounding, Respondent No. 4 was not disqualified and there was no suppression....

The Petitioner, a candidate for the post of President of the Goa Football Association (GFA), challenged the election of Respondent No. 4 on the ground that Respondent No. 4 was disqualified under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SVLDR Scheme Benefits for Redemption Fine Waiver and Directs Acceptance of Withdrawn Application. The Court held that redemption fine is covered under the waiver provisions of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and that rejection on erroneous ground of withdrawal is invalid....

The Bombay High Court dealt with a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by a limited liability partnership firm and its partners challenging the rejection of their declarations under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Directs Recalculation of Compensation Using 1/1/2014 as Reference Date Under Section 24(1)(a) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013, Where Award Was Made After Commencement of New Act....

The petitioners were owners of agricultural land in Choundi village, Latur district, Maharashtra, which was acquired by the State. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Set Aside Abatement and Implead Legal Representatives in Partition Suit — Trial Court's Rejection of Application Under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC Quashed for Failure to Consider Sufficient Cause....

The petitioners, who were the plaintiffs in a suit for partition and separate possession, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Haveri, dated 30.06.2018, wh...