Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Civil Suit for Recovery Due to Evidence Closure. Trial Court's Closure of Evidence Found Erroneous as Only One Opportunity Was Provided to the Defendant....

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the predecessor of the plaintiffs-respondents for recovery of Rs.2,03,300/- along with interest and a declaration for allotment of a shop. The suit was ini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Trial Court's Order on Limitation in Specific Performance Suit. The suit was dismissed as it was filed beyond the limitation period of three years from the date the cause of action accrued....

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent for specific performance of an agreement dated 25th January, 1992. The agreement required both parties to fulfill their obligations by 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Due to Miscarriage of Justice. The trial Court's closure of evidence without adequate opportunity for the defendant led to an erroneous decree favoring the plaintiffs....

The dispute arose from Special Civil Suit No.204 of 1990, where the predecessor of the plaintiffs sought recovery of Rs.2,03,300/- with interest and a declaration for allotment of a shop. After a leng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Trial Court's Order on Limitation in Specific Performance Suit. The suit was barred by limitation as it was filed after the stipulated period for specific performance under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908....

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent for specific performance of an agreement dated 25th January, 1992. The agreement required the parties to fulfill their obligations by 31...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown. The court ruled that irretrievable breakdown is not a recognized ground for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955....

The case involved an appeal filed by a husband against the dismissal of his divorce petition by the High Court of Delhi. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 26.02.1993,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Refund of Excess Coal Payments with Interest Due to Non-Compliance. Court Holds E-auction Scheme Invalid, Mandating Refunds with Interest Calculated Till Actual Payment Date....

The case involved multiple interlocutory applications and contempt petitions concerning the implementation of a court order regarding the refund of excess coal payments made by non-core linked consume...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Debt Recovery Case — Adjusts Interest Rate. The court found the previously awarded interest rates to be exorbitant and directed a reduction to a reasonable rate of 9% under Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908....

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madras which dismissed the writ petitions filed by the appellant, C.K. Sasankan, confirming the decision of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Murder — Upholds Life Imprisonment. The court affirmed the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony despite the appellant's claims of bias....

The case involved an appeal against the conviction of an individual for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellant was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Ferozep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. The court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC based on corroborative medical evidence and timely FIR....

The appeal challenged the conviction of the appellants for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The informant, Murlidhar Krishna Ronge, r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Case — Ex Parte Order Set Aside for Fresh Hearing. The court found that the appellant was not aware of the hearing date due to their counsel's failure to communicate, necessitating a fresh hearing under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986....

The case involved an appeal by an insurance company against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which had partially allowed a claim made by the respondent for an insurance...