Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees....

The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, concerning recovery of certain properties. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Railway Promotion Policy, Holds That Equal Opportunity in Employment Applies Only Within Same Class. Promotion of Guards to Higher Grade Station Master Posts Does Not Violate Article 16(1) as Guards and Roadside Station Masters Constitute Distinct and Separate Classes....

This is a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India filed by the All India Station Masters’ and Assistant Station Masters’ Association on behalf of Roadside Station Masters of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Decides on the Validity of Arbitral Award Covering Foreign Immoveable Properties Excluded from Preliminary Decree in a Partition Suit. Construction of Reference to Arbitration under Section 21 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 Clarified....

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by the respondent, Subramaniam Chettiar, against his brother, Nachiappa Chettiar, and his sons (appellants 1 to 5), seeking division of joint family prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Official Liquidators' Appeal in Company Winding-Up Rent Claim Dispute. Landlord's Claim for Rent Priority Denied as Proviso to Rule 97 of Company Rules Does Not Grant Precedence Over Other Creditors....

The dispute arose out of the winding up of U. P. Union Bank Ltd. The bank was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent landlord. After the winding up order, the Official Liquidators removed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Dismissal of Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Receiver's Sale Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC. Order 21 Rule 89 Held Not Applicable to Receiver Appointed Under Section 51 CPC as Sale Not Conducted Under Order 21....

In execution of a money decree, the judgment debtor defaulted on payment of agreed instalments. The executing court, invoking Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, appointed a receiver with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes One-Year Renewal of Stage Carriage Permits Under Section 58 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Renewal Period Must Conform to Original Permit Period, Minimum Three Years....

The case originated from the expiry of stage carriage permits held by the petitioners on March 31, 1958. They applied for renewal before the Regional Transport Authority, Bangalore. The Mysore State T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consignor's Claim Against Indian Railways for Loss of Goods Under Implied Bailment. Implied Contract of Bailment Found Between Consignor and E.P. Railway Despite Initial Contract with Pakistan Railway Under Indian Contract Act, 1872 Sections 148 and 194....

The dispute arose from the non-delivery of goods consigned in 1947 from Quebec, Pakistan, to New Delhi, India. The consignor, Amar Singh, booked goods with the North Western (N.W.) Railway in Pakistan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Right to Claim Both Gratuity and Retrenchment Compensation; Section 25F(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, interpreted to allow dual benefits....

The dispute originated from an industrial reference between the Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and its workmen concerning a claim for gratuity. The employer had framed a gratuity scheme under a previous tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State in Essential Commodities Control Order Continuation Case Due to Savings Provisions. Cotton Textiles (Control of Movement) Order, 1948, Held to Continue in Force Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955, by Virtue of Section 16 of the Ordinance and Section 16(2) of the Act....

The dispute arose from a prosecution under the Cotton Textiles (Control of Movement) Order, 1948. The Order was originally made by the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Supplies (Tem...