Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct....

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal mining. The case arose from a Magistrate's suo motu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff....

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Rajasthan Limited (APRL), a generating company. APRL ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Contempt Case for Violation of Asset Restraint Orders. The court found that the review petitioner failed to show any error apparent on record justifying interference, as the omitted reply did not contradict the factual basis of the contempt findings....

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions filed by Dr. Vijay Mallya against the judgment dated 09.05.2017, which had found him guilty of contempt of court. The background involved recovery proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Victim's Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Victim Cannot Appeal Under Section 372 CrPC for Inadequate Sentence; Only State Government Can Seek Enhancement Under Section 377 CrPC....

The appellant, Parvinder Kansal, was the father of a deceased boy and the complainant in FIR No.742 of 2007 registered for offences under Section 364A read with Section 34 IPC. The second respondent w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Release of Compensation Pending Conviction Appeals in Custodial Torture Case. Compensation awarded under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. cannot be released during pendency of appeals against conviction and sentence....

The appellant, Dalbir Singh, is the father of a 20-year-old son who died due to custodial torture in a police lock-up in 2006. The Trial Court convicted six police officers for offences including Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Dispute on Gas Connection Charges. Measuring Equipment Installed for Supplier's Billing Purposes Not Taxable Under 'Supply of Tangible Goods Service' as Customer Does Not Use the Equipment....

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal which set aside a demand for service tax on gas connection charges collected by M/s Adani Gas Ltd. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341....

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act, 2006, which provided that 50% of vacancies re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — High Court Erred in Reversing First Appellate Court's Refusal of Possession Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Cannot Be Entertained Without Formulating a Substantial Question of Law....

The case involves a property dispute between Nazir Mohamed (appellant) and J. Kamala (respondent) over a building and premises in Aduthurai, Tamil Nadu. The appellant claimed ownership through a 1938 ...