Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Service Law Dispute Over Selection Grade Benefits Due to Limitation and Eligibility Issues. Suit Filed Seven Years After Retirement Barred Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and Employee Ineligible for Selection Grade Due to Multiple Disciplinary Penalties Under Clause 7 of Office Order Dated 25 January 1992....

The dispute originated from the respondent's claim for Selection Grade benefits under an Office Order dated 25 January 1992 issued by the Finance Department of the Government of Rajasthan. The respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Industrial Dispute Over Contract Labour Wages and Settlement Binding Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. High Court Sustained Tribunal Award on Substantive Issues but Remanded for Individual Wage Scale Determination Due to Tribunal's Failure to Apply Basis to Facts....

The dispute originated from a Direct Action notice raised by the Oil Field Employees Association on 26 August 2016, representing workmen engaged by contractors of the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions....

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited, and the respondent, Hitro Energy Solutions Privat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Premature Retirement Order of Head Constable Under Fundamental Rules and CCS (Pension) Rules. The Court Held That Judicial Review of Compulsory Retirement Is Limited to Mala Fides, Arbitrariness, or Perversity, and Entire Service Record Including Old Adverse Entries and Uncommunicated Remarks Can Be Considered....

The appeal arose from an order of the Delhi High Court that set aside the premature retirement of a Head Constable under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules read with Rule 48(1)(b) of the CCS (Pension...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Industrial Disputes Act Case Due to Labour Court's Jurisdictional Overreach. Labour Court Exceeded Authority Under Section 33(C)(2) by Adjudicating Seriously Disputed Employer-Employee Relationship Without Prior Recognition of Claim....

The dispute arose from an application filed by respondent No.2 before the Labour Court under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, demanding difference of wages from 01.04.2006 to 31....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Reliable Evidence and Forensic Confirmation. Life Sentence Imposed Under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act Sustained as Lower Courts Properly Assessed Eyewitness Testimonies and Forensic Reports Despite Procedural Issues....

The appeals arose from a High Court judgment convicting the appellants for life under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, while acquitting them under Section 307 IPC. The case involved the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Reliable Eyewitness Testimony. The court affirmed the life sentence under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and one-and-a-half-year sentence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, finding minor inconsistencies in witness statements did not affect core identification of the assailants....

The appeal arose from a murder case where the appellant, along with others, was convicted for the murder of Rajinder alias Raju on October 1, 2008, under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Fraud Case Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. - High Court's refusal to quash proceedings set aside as F.I.R. lacked prima facie evidence against accused for offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC, with allegations limited to purchase of property not under attachment....

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by the original complainant, leading to an F.I.R. registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, against...