Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Special Leave Petition in Pension Calculation Dispute Under Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996. Past Service with State-Controlled Entities Must Be Counted for Pension as Resignation Was with Proper Permission for Another Government Appointment Under Rule 25(2)....

The dispute arose from the State of Rajasthan's refusal to count the Respondent's service tenure from 13 January 1967 to 12 April 1977, during which he worked for the Rajasthan Agriculture Engineering...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses University's Appeal in Medical Admission Quota Dispute, Upholding High Court's Merit-Based Redirection. Admission of lower-merit students from management quota to state quota seats in mop-up round was invalid as it ignored a higher-merit applicant, violating the admission prospectus clauses and merit principles....

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh dated 2 August 2022, which allowed a writ petition filed by the first respondent, a medical student. The dispute centered on admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Conflict on Taxability of Tobacco Products to Constitution Bench for Clarification on Precedent Doctrine. Dispute Involves Whether Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Covered Under Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957 is Exempt from State Sales Tax Under Various State Enactments....

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning the taxability of pan masala containing tobacco and gutka under various State sales tax acts. The central issue was whether such products, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. High Court Erred in Adopting Hypertechnical Approach to Complaint Averments Under Section 141, as Specific Allegations of Partner's Involvement in Firm Affairs Disclosed Prima Facie Case for Trial....

The appeal arose from a criminal complaint filed under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the appellant, a dairy business, against a partnership firm and its ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute Over Agreement to Sell. The court quashed orders directing payment of deficient stamp duty under Entry No. 5 of Schedule 1-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 as amended by the State of Punjab, holding that possession was not delivered under the agreements as per recitals....

The dispute arose from a civil suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Agreement dated 24.02.1996 and an agreement to sell dated 14.05.2011 concerning suit land. The appellant, as original pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Order in Murder Case Due to Inadequate Consideration of Gravity and Accused's Role. High Court's Generic Observation Without Discussing Specific Allegations Under Section 302 IPC Rendered Bail Order Unsustainable, Leading to Direction for Accused's Surrender....

The appeal arose from a bail order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in a murder case. The original complainant, Nitu Kumar, challenged the High Court's order dated 21.07.2022 that g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer....

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to delay in handing over possession of an apartment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiffs' Appeal Against Impleadment of Subsequent Purchasers as Defendants in Civil Suit - Sets Aside High Court and Trial Court Orders. Court Held That Plaintiffs Are Dominus Litis and Cannot Be Compelled to Implead Defendants Against Their Wish Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, Though Non-Impleadment Is at Plaintiffs' Risk Regarding Counter-Claim....

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising from a property dispute where the appellants (original plaintiffs) had filed Civil Suit No. 298/2011 for declaration, permanent injunction, and recovery ...