Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Eviction Order Under Karnataka Rent Control Act — Tenant's Status Declared Invalid....

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the appellant for recovery of possession of premises occupied by the original tenant, Bhaskaran, who defaulted on rent and allegedly sublet the premises. After B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Sales Tax Exemption Case — Clarifies Definition of Sweetmeat. The court determined that toffee qualifies as sweetmeat under the exemption notification, contrary to the lower courts' findings....

The dispute involved two appeals concerning the classification of 'toffee' under the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948, specifically regarding its eligibility for sales tax exemption. The appellants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against Advocate for Scandalous Language. The court found the language used by the advocate in his petitions to be abusive and scandalous, undermining judicial authority....

The case involved Ajay Kumar Pandey, a practicing advocate, who filed multiple complaints and petitions against various judicial officers, alleging defamation and misconduct. His complaints were dismi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Matter — Sales in Course of Import Not Taxable. Sales made by the appellant to SAIL and Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. were deemed to be in the course of import under Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and thus not liable to sales tax....

The dispute arose from the levy of sales tax on sales made by a government undertaking, the appellant, to SAIL and Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. The appellant, acting as a canalising agent for the import a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Land Ownership Dispute — No Interference Required....

The dispute involved the ownership of lands bearing Survey Nos. 284/1, 286, 291/A, 292/2, 283, and 291/B between the appellants and a party named Zipabai. The Commissioner in the revisional proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Arms and TADA Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Working Condition of Firearm. Citing absence of proof regarding the operational status of the firearm and live cartridges, the court overturned the conviction under the Arms Act and TADA Act....

The case involved an appeal by the appellant against his conviction under Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 5 of the TADA Act. The appellant was found in possession of a double-barrel shotgun and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Disciplinary Action Against Advocate for Lack of Evidence. The court found insufficient proof of professional misconduct under the Advocates Act, 1961....

The case involved an appeal by an advocate against a disciplinary action taken by the Bar Council of India, which suspended him from practice for one year due to alleged professional misconduct. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions on Phasing Out Old Commercial Vehicles to Combat Pollution. Court modifies earlier order to phase out vehicles over 20 years old to address pollution while considering public hardship....

The case involved the Supreme Court's intervention to address severe traffic and pollution issues in the National Capital Territory of Delhi. The court was prompted to act due to dissatisfaction with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Addition of Accused in Criminal Proceedings — Clarifies Jurisdictional Limits. The court ruled that the Sessions Court cannot add an accused before evidence is collected, emphasizing the need for adherence to procedural requirements under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973....

The case involved an appeal concerning the addition of an accused by the Sessions Court prior to the collection of evidence. The appellant, Ranjit Singh, was added as an accused in a case where he was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Eviction Case for Fresh Consideration Due to Oversight of Mandatory Proviso. The High Court failed to consider the mandatory hardship proviso under Section 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, necessitating a remand for fresh disposal....

The dispute involved eviction proceedings initiated by the respondent, Gomathi Ammal, against the appellants, who were tenants in her lodging house located in Nagerkoil. In 1982, the respondent filed ...