Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellate Tribunal's Decision on Income Tax Deductions — Clarifies Perquisite Definition....

The dispute arose from a civil appeal against a judgment of the Karnataka High Court regarding the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner, V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Pvt. Ltd., challenged the High Court's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decision Against Claim of Adhivasi Rights in U.P. Act Case — Clarifies Status of Sub-tenants from Mortgagees....

The case involved an appeal concerning the claim of adhivasi rights over agricultural land under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950. The appellant, Chandrika Prasad, was the son of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decision Against Claim of Adhivasi Rights in U.P. Land Case — Clarifies Legal Status of Sub-tenants from Mortgagees. The court ruled that a sub-tenant from a mortgagee cannot claim adhivasi rights under Section 20 of the U.P. Act....

The case involved a dispute over the claim of adhivasi rights by the appellant, Chandrika Prasad, whose father, Ram Harakh, contended that he had rights over two plots of agricultural land in Uttar Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in IPC Section 302 Case — Reduces Charge to Section 304 Part II. The appellant's conviction for murder was altered to culpable homicide not amounting to murder due to lack of intent....

The case involved the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) following an incident that occurred during the Arlem Festival in Goa. The appellant, along with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decision Against Claim of Adhivasi Rights in U.P. Land Dispute — Clarifies Legal Status of Sub-tenants from Mortgagees. The court ruled that a sub-tenant from a mortgagee cannot claim adhivasi rights under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950....

The dispute arose from a claim for adhivasi rights over two plots of agricultural land in Uttar Pradesh. The appellant, Chandrika Prasad, claimed these rights based on his father's possession as a sub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in IPC Section 302 Case — Reduces Charge to Section 304 Part II. The appellant's conviction for murder was set aside as the act was done with knowledge likely to cause death but without intention to kill....

The case involved the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) following an incident that occurred during the Arlem Festival in May 1993. The appellant, along...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decision Against Claim of Adhivasi Rights in U.P. Land Case — Clarifies Legal Status of Sub-tenants from Mortgagees. The court ruled that a sub-tenant from a mortgagee cannot claim adhivasi rights under the U.P. Act, as such claims do not meet the statutory definitions....

The case involved a dispute over the claim of adhivasi rights by the appellant, Chandrika Prasad, concerning two plots of agricultural land in Uttar Pradesh. The appellant's father, Ram Harakh, claime...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in IPC Section 302 Case — Reduces Charge to Section 304 Part II. The court held that the appellant's act of hitting the victim was done with knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to kill, thus falling under Section 304 Part II IPC....

The case involved the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) following an incident during the Arlem Festival in Goa. The appellant, along with others, was a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Common Intention. Distinction Between Common and Similar Intention Clarified Under Section 34 IPC....

The case involved an appeal by Rajendra Singh and Triloki Singh against their conviction for the murder of Kameshwar Singh. The incident occurred on July 4, 1977, in village Jaidpur Tola Pilui, where ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Municipal Election Dispute — Clarifies Voting Procedures. The court ruled that all members must be allowed to participate in the election process, regardless of prior walkouts, under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911....

The dispute arose from the election process for the President of the Municipal Council, Bareta, under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. A meeting was convened on April 7, 1998, but due to lack of quorum...