Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Pension Claims of Resigned BSF Personnel — Clarifies Eligibility Criteria. The court ruled that resignation does not equate to retirement, and members of BSF who resigned before completing 20 years of service are not entitled to pensionary benefits under the CCS (Pension) Rules....

The dispute arose regarding the entitlement of pensionary benefits for members of the Border Security Force (BSF) who resigned after serving for more than ten years but less than twenty years. The res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal Challenging Tax Collection by Development Authority Due to Lack of Services. Validation of Past Tax Collections Declared Invalid as it Contradicted High Court Findings....

The dispute arose from the Bangalore Development Authority's (BDA) authority to levy taxes on properties outside the Bangalore City Corporation limits. The appellant, B. Krishna Bhat, along with other...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Import Case — Import of Components for Machinery Upheld. The court found that the import of components necessary for the operation of machinery did not contravene the import permit....

The case involved an appeal against the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal regarding the import of machinery components by an approved unit in the Kandla Free Trade Zon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Procedural Lapses. The trial court's failure to examine witnesses present led to a miscarriage of justice, necessitating the setting aside of the acquittal....

The case involved an appeal by the State of U.P. against the acquittal of nine respondents charged with murder, attempt to murder, and rioting. The trial court had failed to examine key witnesses, inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case with Life Imprisonment for Key Accused. The court confirmed the life sentences for the main accused while dismissing appeals against acquittals of others....

The case involved a brutal attack on the family of Bhagwan Ram, resulting in multiple murders, including that of Bhagwan Ram himself, his son Sunder Ram, and his mother Chando Devi. The attack occurre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MPID Act Case — Clarifies Indefeasible Right to Bail. The court held that the right to bail under Section 167(2) is extinguished upon the filing of the challan, and mere application for bail does not constitute availing of the right....

The case involved an appeal by the appellant against the State of Maharashtra concerning the interpretation of the right to bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in the co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tribunal's Award for Reinstatement of Workmen. The Tribunal's finding that the workmen were employees at the time of nationalisation was upheld, and the amendment to Section 14 of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act, 1973 did not affect their rights....

The dispute arose between the management of Ramkanali Colliery and four workmen who claimed to have been employed since 1972 but were stopped from working. The management contended that the coal mines...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition in Companies Act Case — No Grounds for Winding Up Established. The Petitioners failed to demonstrate oppression or mismanagement under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956....

The dispute arose from a petition filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and mismanagement by the majority shareholders of Bagress Cereals Pvt. Ltd. The Calcu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Regarding Gratuity Claims Under State and Central Acts — Central Act Not Applicable. Court found that the Central Act did not apply as the employees' wages exceeded the threshold, allowing the State Act to govern gratuity claims....

The dispute involved gratuity claims by employees who had retired under a voluntary retirement scheme after working for the appellant from 1958 to 1984. Following their retirement, the employees filed...