Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Duty Case Due to Lack of Marketability Evidence. The court found that the intermediate products were not marketable and thus not subject to excise duty under Section 11A of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944....

The case involved two civil appeals concerning the liability of M/s. Cadila Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. to pay excise duty on certain intermediate products manufactured during the production of drugs. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Disability Employment Case — Upholds Rights Under the Persons with Disabilities Act. Citing the need for employers to provide alternative roles for employees with disabilities, the court emphasized the mandatory nature of Section 47 of the Act....

The case involved an appeal by a former constable of the Special Service Bureau who suffered a leg injury while on duty, leading to amputation and subsequent invalidation from service. The appellant c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Letters Patent Appeal in Succession Act Case — Clarifies Applicability of CPC Provisions....

The case involved an appeal concerning the maintainability of a letters patent appeal against a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Land Grant and Alienation Prohibition. The court found that the upset price did not reflect the market value, thus the prohibition against alienation applied under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978....

The dispute involved the appellant's purchase of land originally allotted to Nanjaiah alias Gunsaiah under the Mysore Land Revenue Act, 1888. The land was granted for an upset price of Rs. 750, but th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Karnataka Excise Rules — Upholds State's Monopoly in Liquor Distribution. Citing the doctrine of unjust enrichment, the court directed the appellants to pay commission to MSIL for transactions conducted post the appointed date....

The dispute arose from the appellants challenging the validity of notifications issued under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, which created a monopoly for Mysore Sales International Ltd. (MSIL) in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State of U.P. Against Quashing of Order Divesting Zila Panchayat Adhyaksha of Powers — Legal Interpretation of Inquiry Rules Clarified....

The dispute arose when the respondent was elected as Zila Panchayat Adhyaksha in Sultanpur, U.P. in 1995. Following complaints against her, the State Government directed an inquiry, which was conducte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Appeal in Narcotics Control Bureau Case — Validity of NCB's Authority Affirmed. The court found that the Narcotics Control Bureau is a branch of the Department of Revenue, thus its officers are authorized to conduct searches and seizures under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985....

The case involved an appeal by the State through the Narcotics Control Bureau against a High Court decision that quashed the conviction of the respondent for drug-related offenses under the Narcotic D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — No Infirmity Found in High Court's Judgment. The acquittal was upheld due to doubts regarding eyewitness credibility and discrepancies in evidence....

The case involved an appeal by the State of Punjab against the acquittal of Sucha Singh and others for the murder of Sarabjit Singh. The Addl. Sessions Judge had convicted the accused under Section 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Contempt Finding Against Advocate and Appellant but Accepts Apology. The court confirmed the contempt finding against the advocate for failing to adhere to professional responsibilities under the Contempt of Court Act, 1971....

The case involved an appeal against a contempt of court ruling by the Rajasthan High Court, where the appellant Radha Mohan Lal and his advocate Sualal Yadav were found guilty of contempt for filing a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee for Misconduct in Transport Service — Punishment Found Proportionate to Misconduct....

The dispute arose from the dismissal of an employee of the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation for misconduct involving ticketless passengers and possession of old tickets. The employee, appointed a...