Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Employment Dispute Due to Misconduct and Loss of Confidence. Dismissal Found Justified Despite Lack of Inquiry Under Article 311(2) of the Constitution....

The case involved a dispute between an employer and an employee regarding the dismissal of the employee without an inquiry. The employee was appointed on a probationary basis in May 1981 and was dismi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to Excise Duty Demand — Clarifies Applicability of Exemptions....

The case involved M/s Amco Batteries Limited, which challenged a demand for excise duty imposed by the Collector of Central Excise for the period from March 1, 1986, to August 13, 1989. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Termination of Employment Due to Suppression of Information. The respondent's failure to disclose a pending criminal case in the attestation form constituted a major offence under the terms of employment, justifying termination....

The dispute arose from the termination of the respondent, a Physical Education Teacher, for allegedly suppressing information regarding a pending criminal case in his attestation form. The respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Decision on Lease Violation. The court found that the lease terms did not prohibit non-residential use of the property, thus upholding the High Court's ruling....

The dispute arose from a lease deed dated December 10, 1952, executed by the Union of India, leasing a plot of land to the predecessor of Shiv Dayal Soin & Sons Pvt. Ltd. for 99 years under the Displa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Classification Case — Glass Moulds Confirmed as Articles of Glass. The classification of glass moulds was upheld under Central Excise Tariff Heading 70.15 based on their distinct characteristics and market recognition....

The dispute arose between Forbes Gokak Limited and the Collector of Central Excise, Aurangabad regarding the classification of glass moulds under the Central Excise Tariff. The Customs Excise and Gold...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Trial Court's Judgment in Property Dispute Case Due to Incorrect Application of Limitation Law. The Limitation Act, 1963 was found applicable, not the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920, as the oral gift was void....

The case involved a property dispute where the plaintiffs, led by Surtu, challenged the validity of an oral gift made by their mother, Basanti, in favor of the defendants, Ram Ditta and Khazan. The tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Contempt Sentences in Election Commission Case — Upholds Need for Compliance with Court Orders....

The case involved two appeals against a common judgment and order passed by the High Court in a Criminal Contempt Petition. The respondent no. 2, an employee of Manipur Electronics Development Corpora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Central Excise Rebate Calculation Method. The court upheld the exclusion of nil production years in calculating average production for rebate eligibility under the Central Excise Act, 1944....

The dispute arose from the calculation method for average sugar production to determine eligibility for a central excise rebate under Notification No. 135/83-CE. The appellant, Sahyadri Sahakari Sakha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Invalid Adoption Claim. Adoption After Death of Sole Surviving Coparcener Invalidates Claim to Vested Property Rights....

The appeal arose from a partition suit concerning the property rights of the plaintiffs and defendants, following the death of Vyankat, the sole surviving coparcener. The plaintiffs, Namdev Vyankat Gh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Judgment on Market Fee Collection. The court found that the Market Committee had provided some services justifying the levy of market fee under the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural (Produce & Livestock) Markets Act, 1966....

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that allowed a second appeal by the Rajam Jute and Oil Millers Association against the Agriculture Market Committee, Rajam. The plaint...