Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Delay and Lack of Evidence. The court found that the delay in issuing the detention order was not justified and that relevant evidence had been withheld from the detaining authority....

The case involved an appeal against a detention order issued under the COFEPOSA Act, 1974. The appellant, an industrialist engaged in the manufacture of exportable goods, was detained following a raid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Public Auction and Directs Eviction of Retired Justice from Government Bungalow. The court upheld the validity of the public auction and directed the occupant to vacate the premises following the acceptance of the bid amount....

The dispute arose from a writ petition concerning the possession of a government bungalow occupied by a retired judge, Mr. Justice B.P. Banerjee. The Supreme Court had previously directed the governme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Granting Police Protection in Trust Dispute Due to Jurisdictional Overreach. High Court's Determination of Disputed Facts in Writ Jurisdiction Found Improper....

The dispute arose between parties regarding the position of Madathipathi and Sthiradhyakshan of the Vadayampadi Ashramam. The respondent claimed to hold this position and sought police protection afte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Rights in Property Dispute — Recognizes First Respondent's Possession Pending Further Proceedings....

The dispute arose from a property transaction involving the Society of Congregation of the Brothers of the Sacred Heart and subsequent sales of the property. The Society claimed that a sale executed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Exemption Case — Promissory Estoppel Principles Affirmed. The court found that the State's retrospective amendment to include solvent extraction plants in the negative list violated the principles of promissory estoppel, as substantial investments had been made based on prior representations....

The dispute arose from appeals concerning the applicability of promissory estoppel in relation to sales tax exemptions under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The appellants, Mahabir Vegetable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Due to Credible Eyewitness Testimony. Acquittal by High Court Found to be Perverse and Unsupported by Evidence....

The case involved an appeal by the State of Jammu & Kashmir against the acquittal of S. Mohan Singh and S. Prithpal Singh by the High Court after their conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Petitioner's Right to Know Reasons for Deportation — Ensures Fair Procedure in Immigration Matters. The court directed that the petitioner must be informed of the reasons for his deportation and allowed to make a representation....

The case involved a writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking to quash the order cancelling his Residence Visa Permit and to prevent his deportation from India. The petitioner, born in India to Iran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Excise Matter — Tribunal's Findings Affirmed. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the appellant satisfied the requirements for not taking Modvat credit on inputs used in exempted goods under Rule 57-CC of the Central Excise Act, 1944....

The case involved an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi against Lifelong Appliances Ltd. regarding the issue of Modvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing Charges in SC/ST Act Case Due to Erroneous Legal Reasoning. High Court's Finding of Accidental Injury Ignored Relevant Provisions of IPC and Cr.P.C....

The case arose from an appeal by the complainant against a High Court order that quashed charges against an accused in a murder case involving the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Classification of Ayurvedic Products as Medicaments under Central Excise Tariff Act. The court confirmed that products intended for treating ailments are classified as medicaments under Chapter 30, while those without medicinal properties fall under Chapter 33....

The dispute arose between a manufacturer of Ayurvedic products and the Commissioner of Central Excise regarding the classification of these products under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appe...