Supreme Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Procedure Case Due to Non-Service of Notice. Non-Compliance with Notice Requirements Led to Erroneous Ex-Parte Decree Under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC....

The case involved an appeal by the appellant challenging the dismissal of her application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the Delhi High Court and the Additional Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Case — Conviction Upheld. The court found substantial evidence of motive and guilt leading to the conviction under Section 302 IPC....

The case involved the murder of P. Sesha Sudha, who was an ad-hoc Lecturer and had a marriage proposal with the accused, Kuchibotla Saran Kumar. The marriage was fixed for 23rd March 2000, but differe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Upholds High Court's Judgment on Title Transfer. Citing the principles of lis pendens and the effect of impleadment, the court affirmed that the title passed to subsequent purchasers despite the pending suit....

The appeal arose from a property dispute involving an agreement for sale dated 12.2.1978 between Shahul Hameed and Arunachalam, the father of the appellant. Following a series of transactions, includi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Management in Industrial Dispute Case Due to Invalid Strike Notice. Strike Notice Fails to Meet Legal Requirements Under Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947....

The case involved an appeal by the management of Essorpe Mills Ltd against the dismissal of Writ Appeals by the Madras High Court concerning the illegal strike by workers. The workers had gone on stri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Position in Land Acquisition Dispute — Interpretation of Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act Clarified....

The case involved appeals concerning the entitlement of claimants to benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically Sections 23(1-A), 23(2), and 28. The factual background indicated that ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicles Act Case — Clarifies Liability of Insurer for Hired Goods Vehicle. The court determined that the insurance policy covers authorized representatives of goods, even without goods present....

The case involved an appeal by an insurance company regarding liability for injuries sustained by a coolie-worker who hired a goods carriage vehicle. The claimant alleged that he suffered injuries due...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Interim Orders in Forest Produce Seizure Case — Clarifies Authority and Compensation Issues. The court confirmed the legality of interim orders for the release of seized Kendu leaves while addressing the delegation of powers to Gram Panchayats under Article 243(G) of the Constitution....

The case involved appeals against an order from the Patna High Court concerning the release of Kendu leaves seized by the Forest Department from certain respondents. The appeals were filed by the Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — Adjusts Loss of Dependency Calculation. The court found that the previous assessment of loss of dependency was incorrect and directed a reassessment under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988....

The case involved an appeal regarding compensation for the death of Raj Kamal Sharma in a road accident on 19th February 1993. The appellants, his parents, initially received compensation from the Mot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Amendment of Selection Notice for Delhi Higher Judicial Service Due to Illegal Change in Criteria. Introduction of Minimum Marks for Viva-Voce After Selection Process Commenced Held Impermissible....

The case involved two writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by Hemani Malhotra and Vineeta Goyal against the High Court of Delhi. The petitions sought a writ of mandamus to amend a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Right to Exclude Time in Arbitration Case — Clarifies Applicability of Limitation Act Provisions....

The case involved appeals against judgments of the High Court of Karnataka regarding the applicability of the Limitation Act to applications for setting aside arbitral awards under the Arbitration and...