Judgements by Adv Aasma Mulla

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A-Kharab vs B-Kharab Land Judgment: Karnataka High Court Rules No Reclassification Without Survey & Records (2026)...

The dispute concerned land in Survey No.20 of Chinnappanahalli Village, which had been granted to the petitioner’s grandfather under the Mysore (Personal and Miscellaneous) Inams Abolition Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Revocation of Probate Not Maintainable on Grounds of Title Dispute. Bombay High Court...

The Bombay High Court held that a probate cannot be revoked on the ground that the testator lacked title to the bequeathed property. Such a contention raises a title dispute, which is ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Body Building Eligible for 5% Sports Quota Reservation; Quashes Restrictive Government Resolution (2026)...

The petitioner, a university-level Body Building Sportperson, challenged the Government Resolution dated 01/07/2016 which restricted the benefit of 5% sports quota in Government jobs only to sports pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory....

This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in settled possession and were forcibly dispossessed on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Forfeiture of Tenancy under Section 111(g) TPA Not Attracted When Tenant Claims Firm Tenancy Without Denying Landlord’s Title – Bombay High Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Second Appeal No. 81 of 2013 (2026)...

The plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent, and damages claiming that Late Mohd. Siddique was his tenant since 1960. Later, the defendants asserted that the tenancy was i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Removal of Up-Sarpanch and Panchayat Member for Illegal Attempt to Transfer Sarpanch's Statutory Powers | Section 39 Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act...

The petitioner, elected Sarpanch of Hiware Village Panchayat, sought removal of Respondent Nos. 5 (Up-Sarpanch) and 6 (Member) under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court...

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute the conveyance deed despite statutory obligation und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Pending Civil Suits Not a Bar to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA: Quantum Park CHS v. AHCL-PEL & Ors...

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Quantum Park Cooperative Housing Society and quashed the order rejecting its application for unilateral deemed conveyance under Section 11 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court: Partition Suit Involving Properties Outside Jurisdiction Requires Clause XII Leave; Plaint Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for Partial Partition Bar | Renu Balwant Maru v. Bupendra Damjibhai Tank & Ors....

The Bombay High Court held that a partition suit involving immovable properties situated partly outside its territorial jurisdiction is a “Suit for Land” under Clause XII of the Letters Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Expressway Land Acquisition Compensation Process; Dismisses Farmers’ Writ Petitions...

The petitions were filed by farmers whose lands were acquired for the Jalna–Nanded Super Express Highway project. The landowners challenged the compensation proceedings and the subsequent award ...